Skip to Content

Fluoride Officially Classified As A Neurotoxin In World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journal – FALSE

UPDATE: This article has been fact-checked and updated as of September 4, 2024. It has now been updated with the most accurate and current information available.

FACT CHECK NOTES:

Our article originally stated that toothpaste is poisonous and that fluoride is a neurotoxin that doesn’t prevent tooth decay. After thorough review and verification, we have found significant inaccuracies in these assertions that need to be addressed to ensure our readers are correctly informed.

Fluoride is widely recognized and scientifically proven to be effective at preventing tooth decay. Regarding its safety, it is important to highlight that any substance can be toxic if consumed in excessive amounts, including water. The levels of fluoride used in toothpaste are carefully regulated and deemed safe for daily use by health authorities worldwide. The assertion that fluoride at the concentrations found in toothpaste is poisonous is not supported by the scientific consensus.

Our article previously referenced a paper by Lancet Neurology, mistakenly cited as The Lancet, suggesting new findings on fluoride’s neurotoxicity. Upon closer examination, it is clear that this paper did not introduce new data on the neurotoxic effects of fluoride. Instead, it discusses the broader context of chemical exposure and neurotoxicity in children. It references fluoride as one of many chemicals that have been studied for potential neurological effects in high doses, which are significantly greater than those encountered in typical fluoride-containing products like toothpaste.

After our research and consultation with recent studies, it has been confirmed that the use of fluoride in the form of toothpaste is both safe and beneficial for dental health. The concerns regarding neurotoxicity relate to much higher levels of fluoride exposure than those provided by toothpaste.

The information below has been updated with more relevant and accurate information, including hyperlinks to sources. We are committed to correcting the record and continuing to provide our readers with scientifically backed and accurate health information.


Fluoride has long been a focal point of public health discussions, often surrounded by controversy and misinformation. In this article, we delve into the science of fluoride, its natural occurrence, and its role in dental health. We aim to provide a clear understanding of fluoride and address some of the most prevalent controversies and misconceptions, particularly debunking the misleading claim that categorizes it as a neurotoxin. Through a thorough examination of scientific evidence and expert analysis, we seek to clarify the safety and benefits of fluoride, ensuring that the facts stand clear amidst the myths.

Understanding Fluoride

Fluoride is the negative ion of the element fluorine, found widely in nature, including in air, soil, plants, rocks, fresh and seawater, and many foods. It plays a crucial role in the mineralization of bones and teeth, which is essential for maintaining their strength and hardness. In fact, about 99% of the body’s fluoride resides in bones and teeth, highlighting its importance in skeletal and dental health.

Fluoride is particularly valuable for its ability to prevent dental caries or cavities. This benefit has made fluoride a common component in dental care products such as toothpaste. The mechanism behind fluoride’s protective action involves the remineralization of teeth: after eating, residual food particles can be broken down by bacteria in the mouth, producing acids that erode tooth enamel. Fluoride aids in attracting calcium and phosphate from saliva back to the enamel, helping to reinforce it and prevent decay. This process effectively reduces the risk of cavities, which, if untreated, can lead to more severe dental problems.

Due to its effectiveness in preventing tooth decay, fluoride has been added to public water supplies in many countries, starting with Grand Rapids, Michigan in 1945. This practice, known as water fluoridation, was so successful in reducing dental decay that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognized it as one of the top ten public health achievements of the 20th century.

The widespread use of fluoride underscores its importance in dental health, although it’s essential to manage its intake carefully due to the potential for negative effects at high levels. Understanding and maintaining the correct balance of fluoride can help maximize its dental benefits while minimizing any health risks.

A Look at Fluoride Regulations

In the United States, the regulation of fluoride in public water systems is a matter that involves both federal recommendations and local decision-making. The U.S. Public Health Service first endorsed the fluoridation of community water supplies in 1962 to prevent tooth decay. Despite this federal backing, the actual decision to fluoridate water is left to state and local authorities. As of 2020, 62.9% of the U.S. population had access to fluoridated water.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reviewed multiple studies and found no association between fluoridated water at current recommended levels and other adverse health outcomes. However, concerns about higher fluoride concentrations have led to regulatory limits. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set the maximum allowable fluoride level in public water systems at 4 mg per liter, with a lower secondary recommendation of 2 mg per liter to prevent dental fluorosis.

In 2015, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) updated its guidelines, setting the optimal fluoride level at 0.7 parts per million (ppm), a decrease from the previously recommended range of 0.7 to 1.2 ppm established in 1962. This revision aims to balance the benefits of protecting against tooth decay with the risks of too much fluoride exposure.

Globally, the World Health Organization (WHO) advises that fluoride levels in drinking water should not exceed 1.5 ppm to avoid long-term health issues. This international guideline underscores the delicate balance needed in fluoride exposure, which can also come from sources like black tea and swallowed toothpaste, though these typically contribute a minimal amount compared to water.

Fluoride as a Neurotoxin? Unpacking the Controversy

Fluoride has been the subject of various health debates, one of which involves claims about its neurotoxicity. A notable controversy arose from a report published in The Lancet Neurology in March 2014, which was mistakenly attributed to The Lancet, one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals. This report was widely misunderstood and misrepresented in popular media.

The study, led by Dr. Philippe Grandjean and Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, did not introduce new data specifically about fluoride’s neurotoxic effects but discussed the broader issue of chemical neurotoxicity in children, using fluoride as one of several examples. It argued that the science community often struggles to assess the neurotoxicity of chemicals accurately, particularly in developing brains. This paper drew significant criticism and prompted a flurry of responses from both academic and industry scientists, reflecting its controversial reception.

The primary focus of the fluoride discussion in the 2014 publication was a meta-review of 27 studies, mostly conducted in China, where natural fluoride levels in groundwater can be exceptionally high. This review was originally published in 2012 and included some studies with fluoride concentrations far exceeding those allowed in the U.S. It’s important to note that these high concentrations are not comparable to the fluoride levels found in U.S. municipal water systems, where fluoridation is strictly regulated.

Media misrepresentations of this study led to claims that fluoride in drinking water at levels used in the U.S. could lower children’s intelligence—an assertion so misleading that the authors had to issue a clarification emphasizing that their findings should not be applied to typical fluoride exposure levels in the U.S. The controversy underscores the complexities of chemical risk assessment and the importance of context in interpreting scientific studies.

Key Takeaway: Is Fluoride Safe?

Fluoride safety is a topic that garners significant public attention, especially concerning its addition to drinking water and dental products. While some studies have raised concerns about potential associations between fluoride and various health issues, it is important to consider the context and balance of evidence.

Child IQ and ADHD: Research exploring the relationship between fluoride exposure and cognitive development, including IQ and ADHD prevalence, often focuses on areas where fluoride levels in water are naturally high. These studies are not representative of the fluoride levels used in public water systems in countries like the U.S. where fluoridation is carefully regulated. Major health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), support water fluoridation as safe and beneficial at these controlled levels, finding no conclusive evidence that typical fluoride exposure contributes to cognitive impairments or ADHD.

Cancer: The fear that fluoride could cause cancer has been a topic of investigation for decades. The largest and most comprehensive studies, reviewed by the U.S. Public Health Service and international bodies, have found no consistent link between fluoride and cancer risk. These findings are supported by research from the National Cancer Institute and other scientific organizations which have not identified fluoride as a carcinogen at the levels provided in community water supplies.

Other Health Concerns: While excessive fluoride exposure can lead to dental and skeletal fluorosis, these conditions are typically associated with significantly higher levels of fluoride than those used for water fluoridation. Dental fluorosis in the U.S. is generally mild and often seen as faint white lines or streaks on the tooth surface, which does not affect the function of teeth. Moreover, skeletal fluorosis is extremely rare in countries with controlled fluoridation practices.

Overall, when used appropriately, fluoride is considered safe and effective in preventing dental cavities and strengthening bone health. It is endorsed by numerous health agencies globally as a valuable public health tool. Nonetheless, it remains crucial for fluoride levels to be accurately monitored and managed to avoid the risks associated with overexposure.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.